User talk:JamesReyes

Image:Jamesreyes1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jamesreyes1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thucpalmar.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thucpalmar.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 18:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Thuc.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thuc.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 21:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Msm-aerialview.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Msm-aerialview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:COCapitolEmilyGriffith.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:COCapitolEmilyGriffith.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Harrietjacobs.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Harrietjacobs.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 06:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:COCapitolEmilyGriffith.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:COCapitolEmilyGriffith.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. B (talk) 01:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Schuckardt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Schuckardt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sealgoodpracticegif.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sealgoodpracticegif.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sealgoodpracticegif.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sealgoodpracticegif.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sealofgoodpractice.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sealofgoodpractice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Benjiandzex.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Benjiandzex.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Benjizaxalienprincetitle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Benjizaxalienprincetitle.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Thomason Hosp.jpg

File:Thomason Hosp.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Thomason Hosp.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Thomason Hosp.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:YsletaMission.png is now available as Commons:File:YsletaMission.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:YsletaMissionInterior.png is now available as Commons:File:YsletaMissionInterior.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:YsletaHighAltar.png is now available as Commons:File:YsletaHighAltar.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:YsletaMissionOLGShrine.png is now available as Commons:File:YsletaMissionOLGShrine.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:YsletaMission-Sacristy.png is now available as Commons:File:YsletaMission-Sacristy.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Louis Vezelis

I have nominated Louis Vezelis, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Vezelis (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TallNapoleon (talk) 01:49, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:YsletaMissionInterior.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:YsletaMissionInterior.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW (Talk) 15:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:YsletaHighAltar.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:YsletaHighAltar.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW (Talk) 15:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Template:Episcopal Succession

Hello. Are you able to help me ? I have tried to had a 21 section to that template but it don't works. I have had but it don't works on the Bishops Page.

Thank you.

--English nol (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolph de Landas Berghes

Hi,

I am working in the German pendant to Wikipedia:Cleanup, where your article (or better a translation) is listed. We have the problem, that we just don't know from wich source you drew your information on this biography. Maybe you could us help out by telling us this secret :-)

Cheers, --Memnon335bc 23:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Memnon335bc (talk • contribs)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello JamesReyes! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Mark Pivarunas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Anthony Cekada - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Louis Vezelis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Patrick Pedro Broucke de Tralles - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
André Maurice Alexandre Enos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Alfred Seiwert-Fleige

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Alfred Seiwert-Fleige. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Seiwert-Fleige. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Alfred Seiwert-Fleige

I have nominated Alfred Seiwert-Fleige, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Seiwert-Fleige (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tim Song (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BenjiZaxAlienPrinceTitle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BenjiZaxAlienPrinceTitle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

André Maurice Alexandre Enos

Hello, I've just come across this article, which you created years ago, and it needs a bit of cleanup and references. I know nothing about him - can you help? Thanks, Markiewp (talk) 19:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Croiser.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Croiser.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Explaining reversion of good faith edit

Hi. here, I've reverted a good faith edit you made. My edit summary was truncated. It meant to indicate that I had searched in one of the currently cited sources and found several occurrences of "peaceful sea" with no indication that the naming as such was by Magellan, and I read that as indicating that "peaceful sea" was a common name in use in Magellan's time. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of André Maurice Alexandre Enos‎

The article André Maurice Alexandre Enos‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J04n(talk page) 21:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrick Pedro Broucke de Tralles

The article Patrick Pedro Broucke de Tralles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Are Archbishops automatically notable? If not, no notability asserted

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emmanuel Korab for deletion

The article Emmanuel Korab is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Korab until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lear's Fool 10:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francis Sandler for deletion

The article Francis Sandler is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Sandler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Lear's Fool 12:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jpiifanon.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jpiifanon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nudist-beach.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Nudist-beach.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bpaltenbach.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bpaltenbach.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado

WikiProject
Colorado

United States
notice board

The year 2011 has brought many changes to the State of Colorado. Several users have asked us to reactivate WikiProject Colorado. We have a new Governor and other state officers, two new U.S. Representatives, many new state legislators, and a new Mayor of Denver. Many articles about Colorado need to be updated and many Colorado places, people, and organizations need new articles. Portal:Colorado needs some new featured articles.

Can you help us? Please see our list of some requested articles. If you would like to remain an active member of WikiProject Colorado, please leave me a message at User talk:Buaidh or e-mail me at Special:EmailUser/Buaidh. If you cannot help right now, you can go to inactive status and then reactivate your status later. Thanks for any help you can provide. Yours aye, Buaidh 17:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moisés Carmona

The article Moisés Carmona has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Google fails to turn up independent sources beyond a few very brief mentions in one or two books on schismatic Catholicism (essentially only saying that Thuc consecrated him, and he consecrated another sedevacantist, Pivarunas). Note too that despite being ordained as a bishop, he was not legally ordained by the Catholic Church, and his parish remained that of a parish priest. Note also that Thuc line bishops are a dime a dozen and often had very small congregations, therefore their titles do not automatically confer notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TallNapoleon (talk) 07:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Fouhy

The article Thomas Fouhy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only independent mentions I could find were a couple of very old newspaper articles [1]. In this case, given that Thuc-line bishops are a dime a dozen, his ordination as a bishop does not confer notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TallNapoleon (talk) 07:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado Wiknic

All Wikipedians are cordially invited to the Colorado celebration of the 2011 Great American Wiknic on June 25. We will meet Saturday afternoon from 3:00 to 5:00 at the D Note, 7519 Grandview Avenue in Arvada. Please e-mail Jacques Delaguerre at Special:EmailUser/Jaxdelaguerre if you plan to attend. Be there or be square! – Buaidh 19:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject Colorado

It was recently suggested that WikiProject Colorado, to which you are a member, may be inactive or semi-active and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project it appears that there haven't been much active discussion on the talk page in some time and the only content updates appear to be simple maintenance so being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. I have begun a discussion on the projects talk page to see how the members of the project feel about this suggestion. Another user has added the project to the WPUS template and I added it to the list of supported projects in the WPUS main project page but before I take any further action I wanted to contact each of the active members for their input. --Kumioko (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:CMRICoatOfArms.png

Thanks for uploading File:CMRICoatOfArms.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:08, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donald Sanborn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Donald Sanborn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The-Pope (talk) 16:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

You have just broken the three-revert rule on Prince Andrew, Duke of York. See WP:3RR. You must undo your last revert. DrKiernan (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have also broken the rule on Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex. You must not edit-war, and three-reverts is a "bright-line" rule. Breach of the rule can lead to a block. DrKiernan (talk) 20:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"The Prince.." issue

It appears that I have inadvertently stepped into the middle of a hotly disputed issue. I would like to ask you to please assume good faith and not make completely unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry - which is a serious offence on WP. I have no interest in getting involved in this dispute so this is my only post on the matter. Please leave me out of it. Roger (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Prince Andrew, Duke of York

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Prince Andrew, Duke of York. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Violation of WP:3RR on 15 December. Four reverts beginning at 19:48 and ending at 20:05. EdJohnston (talk) 20:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

JamesReyes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a long-time Wikipedia user and have been making constructive contributions for many years. This morning, for the firs time ever, I got into an revert war with user DrKiernan because I felt he was misapplying a consensus on the use of honorifics in an articles openings. I was unaware of the 3-strikes rule. > > This is not something I have done before and I would like to join the discussion on the reason I made my edits in the first place on the articles, so I am requesting that my block be removed. > > The articles in question are: > > Prince Phlip, Duke of Edinburgh > Prince Andrew, Duke of York > Anne, Princess Royal > Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex

Accept reason:

I am going to trust that during the period that would be the duration of the block, you will voluntarily restrict yourself to talkpage editing only on those articles. Edit-warring is the ugly side of Wikipedia, and I believe your sincerity in your statements (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Henry VII of England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elizabeth Stuart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008 Demo.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008 Demo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited The Trial of Robert Kelly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Original Dish Network logo.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Original Dish Network logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Williamson

Thanks for the update, you beat me to it. Drmies (talk) 23:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 04:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pope Liberius, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please discuss at current RFC WT:CATHOLIC Elizium23 (talk) 05:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the exception listed in the MOS you cite: Where an honorific is so commonly attached to a name that the name is rarely found in English reliable sources without it, it should be included. For example, the honorific may be included for "Father Coughlin" (currently at Charles Coughlin) and Mother Teresa. Elizium23 (talk) 23:06, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, JamesReyes. You have new messages at DBD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(x2)

Proposed deletion of George J. Musey

The article George J. Musey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable person - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fanon/version 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fanon/version 2. Since you had some involvement with the Fanon/version 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Notecardforfree (talk) 22:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schuckardt-msm.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Schuckardt-msm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JamesReyes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JamesReyes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Google's G Suite logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Google's G Suite logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louis Vezelis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louis Vezelis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis Vezelis (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 16:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Episcopal succession

Template:Episcopal succession has been nominated for merging with Template:Ordination. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:LARRAZOLO.jpg

The file File:LARRAZOLO.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

US Banknote Contest

November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.

If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FatimaChildren.jpg

The file File:FatimaChildren.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 11#Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 07:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CMRICoatOfArms.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CMRICoatOfArms.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:FatimaChildren.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FatimaChildren.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Donnelly (priest)

The article Michael Donnelly (priest) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for 17 years. No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]